Potential Law Supreme Court Law Suits

[Keith Broaders]

Potential Supreme Court Law Suits

There are many unconstitutional legislative acts that violate the Constitution. The Winner=Take-All practice in 48 state violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Direct Election of Senators violate provisions of Article V of the Constitution. The state District courts, and the Supreme Court need to address these issues need to be consider their Constitutionality.

Every state ot than Nebraska and Maine are disenfranching nearly half of their voters. The Winner-Take-All method of allocating electoral votes in Presidential elections counts the votes of the candidate winning the state-wide popular vote and disregards the votes received by the runner-up,

This practice is clearly an exactly of a tyranny of the majority which was exactly what our founding fathers were trying to prevent when they established the Electoral College. Instead of preventing tyranny, the current system promotes it.

The Seventeenth Amendment is another example of unconstitutional legislation. In Article V of the Constitution, it guarantees that no state shall be denied their equal suffrage in the senate without their consent.  For the 17th Amendment to have been lawfully ratified the approval of all of the states would have been necessary.

Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, Virginia, and Utah have never given their consent and should not be compelled to surrender the right guaranteed to them in Article V.

[Keith Broaders]

Unconstitutionality of Federal Reserve Act

Unconstitutionality of the 16th Amendment

Unconstitutionality of the 17th Amendment

Unconstitutionality Winner-Take-All

Unconstitutionality Apportionment Act 1929

[David Shipp]

You are correct about the state level winner take all ,, In the states! However, it is to prevent that from happening nation wide, the purpose/function,  of the electoral college is working.  What would you propose to be better?