Watermelons are Not Taxable Income

[Keith Broaders]

The income tax is a direct and un-apportioned tax and is and always has been, unconstitutional. The compensation that you receive from your labor is not a gain and therefore, not income by definition. In fact, income is the profit one receives from being a government employee or from profits from corporate activity. If a man pays you in watermelons for mowing his lawn, are the watermelons considered taxable income?

The fruits of one's labor are the product of one's time and talent and this is not the same thing as income. Whether your compensation comes in the form of watermelons or dollars, it really doesn't matter. Neither the watermelons nor the dollars that you receive as a result of your labor, are income.

For further evidence to support this I direct you to other articles such as;

Income Taxes are a Direct Unapportioned Tax

The National  Debt and The CAFR

The Fed's Big Secret

Income Taxes are Unconstitutional

The Law That Never Was

Taxation Without Representation

Comments? Questions? Replies? Links?

[Bill May]

People have been programmed to think that the terms 'US citizen' and 'citizen of the United States' mean something they don't. People have been programed to believe those terms apply to everyone when they only apply to those people that are citizens of the fed gov via the 14th amendment.

"The 14th Amendment did not alter the status of free white persons, as previously existing." Virginia v. Rivers, 100 U.S. 313, 25 L. ed. 667, 3 Am. Crim. Rep. 524; United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 640, 42, L. ed. 890, 1S Sup. Ct. Rep. 456

"Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state." Crosse v. Bd. of Supvr,s of Elections, 221 A.2d. 431 (1966)

"[W]e find nothing…which requires that a citizen of a state must also be a citizen of the United States, if no question of federal rights or jurisdiction is involved."
[Crosse v. Bd. of Supvrs of Elections, 221 A.2d. 431 (1966) ]

"There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, one of the United States and one of the state".
Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 160 Ala. 155; 48 So. 788 (1909)

[Morton Thomson Jr.]

Bill,

Sounds to me like you would appreciate the info HERE.

[Bill May]

I've seen that. Under the constitutions and under the rules of the current communist occupying force, only the gov can issue passports that are recognized by the courts.  The only way to have the different gov agencies recognize rights is to back the fed appeals courts into ordering them to.

The state courts are all totally communist controlled from a central agency in DC.  The National Center for State Courts and State Justice Institute.  Both part of the same agency.

[Bill May]

Congress had and exercised the power to impose this tax on territorial citizens which are naturally under Art 4 jurisdiction.  The citizenship the 14th creates is also under Art 4.  The 14th secures them very few rights. There is no right to 100% of the proceeds of their own labor. So, what the gov does is to simply impose commercial tax code to the exchange of their labor for other goods or services.

I have previously proven that not everyone is a citizen of the fed gov via the 14th. They are only a citizen of their state.  In order to impose this excise / privilege tax on them, they had to be placed under foreign law / communist occupation.  Yes, that took a declaration of war by the gov on all levels against the sovereign class.

The only way to challenge this in court is as the 9th Ckt stated years ago. The individual must deny being a 'citizen of the United States'.

"The fourteenth amendment creates and defines citizenship of the United States." United States v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas. 829 (1873) Approx 12th paragraph.
https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F.Cas/0024.f.cas/0024...

A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the Federal Government and at the same time a citizen of the State in which he resides. 8th paragraph.
http://www.leagle.com/decision/1953495112FSupp383_1389.xml/KITCHENS...

"The 14th Amendment did not alter the status of free white persons, as previously existing." Virginia v. Rivers, 100 U.S. 313, 25 L. ed. 667, 3 Am. Crim. Rep. 524; United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 640, 42, L. ed. 890, 1S Sup. Ct. Rep. 456

"Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state." Crosse v. Bd. of Supvr,s of Elections, 221 A.2d. 431 (1966)

[Morton Thomson Jr.]

Amendments and Constitutions only restrict government infringement of previously recognized pre-existing, rights. They do not create them. Your point is thereby made moot.

And if we no longer or never have had proper government or courts, then let's not use Stare Decisis or previous court cases, for they are null and void ab initio, if decided by an unlawful body.

[Bill May]

It your response above was a response to my post, it was a complete non sequitur as it in no way addressed anything I said.

[Leldon Thomas Oates]

See 26 USC section 83.

This governs how you compute gross income in regards to compensation for services. The courts have also ruled it applies to wage earners as well as independent contractors. The IRS  cannot talk about it. Also, Congress never named the American people in the statutes. The Secretary named us in the regulations.

[Alan Cooper]

non "common law definition of "wage Earner" in IRS code does NOT apply to 95% of Americans.  A "wage earner" either works for the federal government as a "employee" or is a federal contractor or a federal vendor.  See Lost Horizons.com  A form 4852 is added to the 1040 Return to correctly state one's status and correct W-4 / W-2 / 1099 false reports by private employers who do not know any better.!!

[Bill May]

I had the instructions for the income tax forms quite a few years back and they clearly stated who is subject to the current income tax and who is not.  The forms stated that only 'citizens of the United States' are subject to it.  In the 14th amendment cases, it is made clear that means anyone who owes their citizenship to the 14th amendment and no others.

"The fourteenth amendment creates and defines citizenship of the United States." United States v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas. 829 (1873) Approx 12th paragraph.

"The rights of Citizens of the State, as such, are not under consideration in the Fourteenth Amendment. They stand as they did before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and are fully guaranteed by other provisions." United States v. Anthony: 24 Fed. Cas. 829, 830 (Case No. 14,459) [1873]. This means white citizens and the other provisions are the individual state constitutions.

"The 14th Amendment did not alter the status of free white persons, as previously existing." Virginia v. Rivers, 100 U.S. 313, 25 L. ed. 667, 3 Am. Crim. Rep. 524; United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 640, 42, L. ed. 890, 1S Sup. Ct. Rep. 456

"Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state." Crosse v. Bd. of Supvr,s of Elections, 221 A.2d. 431 (1966)