Social Security - Contract?

[Morton IX]

    Is Social Security a Contract?

A private insurance policy is clearly a contract because the policyholder makes a promise to pay money to the insurance company, which in turn agrees to likewise pay the policyholder if certain contingencies arise.

These "promise to pay" elements are essential for a contract, but they simply are not present with Social Security. First, Social Security "payments" are not premium payments, but are taxes instead. Secondly, there is no corresponding and enforceable "promise to pay" from the Social Security Administration to its "beneficiaries."

As noted above, government contracts are very special and require an appropriation from Congress before money can be expended and a contract made. Regarding Social Security, the only "beneficiaries" who have any claim against the public treasury are those for whom Congress has already made an appropriation, which can last no longer than a year.

The rest of the Social Security claimants in America have no enforceable claim on public funds, and all they possess is a "political promise," upon which Congress can renege at any moment. If Congress decided tomorrow to cut off all Social Security, nobody would have any claim for payment.

Thus, Social Security has never been and is not now a contract.

See Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 610, 80 S.Ct. 1367 (1960)("It is apparent that the noncontractual interest of an employee covered by the Act cannot be soundly analogized to that of the holder of an annuity, whose right to benefits is bottomed on his contractual premium payments"); 

Richardson v. Belcher, 404 U.S. 78, 80, 92 S.Ct. 254, 257 (1971) ("The fact that social security benefits are financed in part by taxes on an employee's wages does not in itself limit the power of Congress to fix the levels of benefits under the Act or the conditions upon which they may be paid"); 

Califano v. Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199, 210, 97 S.Ct. 1021, 1028 (1977) (Brennan J.) (plurality opinion) ("Congress has wide latitude to create classifications that allocate non-contractual benefits under a social welfare program");

and United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166, 174, 101 S.Ct. 453, 459 (1980) ("railroad benefits, like social security benefits, are not contractual and may be altered or even eliminated at any time").

And on a related subject: Watch the Video, then read

Cancelling Your(?) Number

Attention: By following these instructions you assume all responsibility and liability for your own actions ***

Namaste to all and of every political persuasion,

We are here today to inform you that you have the right to cancel your Social Security Number and birth certificate… And reclaim your sovereignty from the unconstitutional United States Corporation. Tired of funding these never ending wars and bank/corporate bailouts? Try this!

How to cancel your Social Security Corporation
1) print out IRS form 966: corporate dissolution
2) under the corporation name put MR/MS/MRS/etc as appropriate and then your full name IN ALL CAPS.
3) under EIN put you SSN
4) under return type, check Other and write in “1040″
5) the rest of the info you can figure out.
6) above your signature write “Without Prejudice UCC 1-308″
7) make a copy for your records
8) send it into the IRS

This next year… Instead of filing taxes… Cancel them!

Why does this work? Your Social Security Number is actually a corporation and a second you. This stems from the idea of “corporate personhood.” The idea of giving corporations the rights of natural humans may seem utterly disgusting, but under Black’s legal dictionary the definition of “person” is a natural human or corporation. This is because they are trying to fool people into self identifying as their SSN corporation! Hence the need to give your Statutory person the rights of a natural human.

Another reason why this works is because of UCC 1-308. Please look it up. This is the code that reserves natural human rights and opts out of the UCC that you don’t know about. This is critical to understand because if a judge were to ever ask you what that means, it is only valid if you know. That is to say, presenting this paperwork to a statutory court, and understanding it, means they don’t have jurisdiction… Not only that but you also then have the Constitutional right to have any and all cases seen by a court of common law…. Or have the case dismissed and compensation dispensed for your troubles. You can tell the difference between a statutory court and a common court because statutory courts use American Flags with a gold fringed borders.

Implications:
-Congratulations, you are a sovereign citizen that has reclaimed your constitutional rights!
-Using or claiming to be your invalid SSN is fraud
-You have the right to have all debts be denominated in Constitutional Money: ounces of gold and silver.
-You have the right to work without a SSN
-You have the right to be paid in ounces of gold or silver.
-You have the right to be treated as a corporation without a SSN but only with discrete opt-in consent.
-Filing taxes would be considered fraud due to need to fill in your invalid SSN. They also only collect unconstitutional Fed Notes which is most certainly not constitutional legal tender: gold or silver.
-Figuratively, all account linked to your statutory person are invalidated
-Technically, if gold or silver is offered and declined, the debt itself is nullified. This include mortgages, car loans, credit cards, student loans, federal and state taxes, etc.
-Anyone that calls to collect on an unconstitutional debt linked to your deceased “person”… asking to speak to you…. They are actually asking two questions… Do you still have a personal statutory corporation? And, do you still self-identify as your corporation? It would be fraud to say yes… As your corporation doesn’t exist anymore!
-You have the right to sign up for a new SSN
-No retirement benefits… As if they will be there when most of us retire. Lol
-You have the right to have all court cases seen by a court of common law or have the case dismissed due to the lack of Statutory Jurisdiction. Your corporate Statutory SSN straw-person is how all corporate statutory courts can claim jurisdiction and pull a fast one on us.

As of the time of this writing, most corporations do not accept gold or silver as legal tender. They are abridging our Constitutional Rights. This is why we must start actually going to stores with gold and silver and reclaim our Right to use this form of money.

Some stores accept gold and silver at US mint pressed denominations. This is tax fraud as they would be claiming to the IRS the face value of these coins instead of the IRS regulation of full trade value. These same stores do not recognize the face value of Constitutional bullion even though the face values are almost always present in the form of “one ounce .999 fine silver” or some such depending on the coin or bar.

When gold and silver are declined as tender, they are abridging their own and your own Constitutionally Guaranteed Rights. No one has the authority to abridge these right including store managers, managers in general, directors, CEOs, clerks, judges, and even the President of the (unconstitutional) United States Corporation. Btw, it was Nixon that took us off the gold standard even though he didn’t have the Enumerated Constitutional Right to do so.

It would be great to see #occupy-spend-silver gathering in places like Whole Foods, Target, Lowes, etc, etc. This would be a great way to regain this Guaranteed right.

As far as solutions go for foreclosures… The bankers are most afraid of the #Occupy-my-house aspect of the #occupy movement because that stops their unconstitutional fraudulent business model. FYI, every mortgage is fraud due to breaking double entry accounting standards during loan originations (accounting fraud), the lack of consideration [non-legalese: skin in the game] in every loan by every bank (contract fraud), and the money doesn’t meet the definition of legal tender (constitutional fraud).

All that said, how about our birth certificates? Well, these certificates are actually printed on financial bond certificates. On the back, there is a red number that defines the financial bond, that is you and is publicly traded!

That is to say, corporate personhood is fraud… So is our birth certificate.

How to cancel a birth bond:
1) print out a birth certificate change form; some financial birth bonds have a change form on the back.
2) enter these three field to be changed: State file id number, date of birth, and “name” as per stated on the bond.
3) enter the values as currently indicated
4) leave the change-to values blank
5) find a religious reason for cancelation. Reincarnation is a great reason. The soul is not born when the body is… It existed before and will exist after we pass on. Internet search for a reincarnation quote from a Zen Buddhist/Daoist master and print it out with a statement like “I am canceling my birth certificate because my soul existed before I was born”
6) above your signature write “Without Prejudice UCC 1-308″
7) make a copy for your records
8) send it in to your state location

This terminates the fraud known as the birth bond.

Rat fact: in Commonwealth states their birth certificates call the person a Subject! This is odd given that most people say that the term Commonwealth is simply antiquity. This term traditionally indicates that the territory is literally owned by the Queen of England. Given that Commonwealth citizens are defined as SUBJECTs by their birth bond…. The probability of the term Commonwealth being “just antiquity” is about zero. Subjects are only defined in relation to the Queen… Just like Canada. Non-commonwealth states use more typical terms like “child’s name” or “name.”

Hopefully this helps move things forward for the #Occupy movement.

Thank you for taking the time to consider this… And possibly spreading it around!

Be the love and peace you wish to see. :D

With peace, love, and respect, - Anonymous

[Morton IX]

Sorry for the added links Q, I just couldn't resist.

[Quisno Rodonovich]

LOL

[Timothy Alan Gard]

I would like all of you to consider something.

When the SHTF, and it will, your own townships will be responsible for the security of your town. There will be no federal agents, no state police, probably not even a county sheriff, although I hope the sheriffs can be generated from such a 'small' area.

Who taxes your property? Your town! So if your townspeople remain free minded people, property taxes will not be used in order to evict anyone except maybe corporations. Lets not forget our neighbors, most of them are good people!

And if you have little or no access to food, then you will need to give labor to the local farmer in exchange for food. Then the farmer can grow more and serve his neighbors by helping him keep people fed.

In times of trouble family comes together. That will be our saving grace. We simply have to have a little faith in God. Judge not lest ye be judged, however.

[Quisno Rodonovich]

Yes I've inferred the same in here.

Its people, their council's Commissioners and law enforcement. You see it all relates to us and as it's our Republic, we the people must enforce our declaration.

[Morton IX]

Have you met my Neighbors Tim?

If you had, You would realize that they are CLUELESS! They don't even recycle, much less have a single idea what they're going to do when TSHTF. They are NOT prepared. They might be good people, but I DO know them and most of them are going to be UTCWAP. That's "Up the Creek, Without a Paddle."

No offense to your positive attitude. It is adorable that you think so highly of MY neighbors. BTW, I've been here over twenty years, so I do know them and there are maybe a handful out of 15,317 that I can count on in this 4 sq, mile town.

[Timothy Alan Gard]

Discouraging, isn't it? But lets put credit where credit is due. Here is what I mean. You do exactly what you have been doing. Focus on the future and speculate the outcome. I believe you and I know exactly what that is. And even if it doesn't, we are prepared, just like our Boy Scout hand book told us. Now, the SHTF and neighbor has no work, no food, no money, and no personal protection. They are swinging in the wind. Then Mom says to Dad,'Doesn't Morton have food?" Can you take it from him? Are you kidding?? That SOB can shoot the eye out of a crow, and you wouldn't believe how many guns he squirreled away before the FED collapsed!' Well, maybe we could ask him for food.' Your reply would be, "Here is a spade, turn the dirt out back on my property and I will give you food and seeds so you can plant your own garden. But you had better make sure you do because I might not need your help next year." Ya, they are going to be suffering greatly, but their present decisions are what put them in that position, not yours! They are not bad people, they are simply not too smart.

[Rosanna Miller]

i think you have to be over 65 to file homestead...

I am sure I am going to take flak for this but I have to say it.... all this free time to chit chat and right now there is a case before the Federal Court about a man who has tortured people from the bench w/o a LEGAL Oath or Bond to do so. The people should be spending their time writing and putting in their special appearance in support. A template is available how easy is that?

Trust me if massive amounts of Amici flooded that court you could watch things change. Then the Reps would have to get on board. I wrote this on behalf of everybody but the people don't care. What a waste of  my time. This is why we are in this mess and the shadow corporate government can carry on because they know people are talkers not doers. 

It would be great to rely on Common Law Juries but HEY you need people... Could luck.. 

[Robert Stoeppelmann]

A homestead exemption in most states is automatic when you buy a personal residence. Any where else it's a simple document you can fill out at any adult age.

[Quisno Rodonovich]

in oregon i heard from a forest ranger that there was still homestead land available. this was back in 2002 i believe. You may check that out.

[Mike]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/09/hackers-stole-social-sec...

Now that millions of SS# may have been compromised, is it the time and appropriate to officially close our social security number and close the so-called account? If it honestly is an account, doesn't the accountholder have the administrative authority to close it?

If so, is it legal/lawful to withdraw the balance in such accounts, or are we required to walk away and relinquish the questionably deposited "savings" and interest?

As an example, when "real" bank account and credit card numbers are compromised, competent banks advise and promote closing those accounts immediately. Reputable financial institutions don't delay or question reasonable security measures and swiftly assist customers to safeguard their identity and finances. Can and should we do that immediately? Who would object and what could they say to prevent us from protecting ourselves and our financial security?

If they reply, "we've got it under control"! Is reasonable to state, "I don't trust you, give me MY money, NOW"! Who could possibly argue with that reasoning?

This would begin a "run on the banks" scenario that would bankrupt the criminal institution, as if we were going to get all our savings anyway.

[Quisno Rodonovich]

 Yeh I agree 5warveteran  it feels like gout.

[Quisno Rodonovich]

Im sorry 5warvetern  Gout like hemorrhoids are earned did we earn this parasite named obama?