Click on the Image above
Click on the imahe above
I Am Not a Sovereign and Neither Are You!
I am not a sovereign and neither are you. We were all endowed by our Creator with the same rights and responsibilities. God who is the Creator is the only sovereign and none of us has authority or jurisdiction over anyone else.
God wrote the laws that govern the universe and the founders of our nation referred to them as the "Laws of Nature and Nature's God". The rules written by legislatures are inferior to the Laws of God. When the laws of men conflict with the laws of God the laws of God take precedent.
I have a right to do whatever I want as long as I do not violate the life, liberty or property of another human. Whenever an individual violates the rights of another they have committed a crime. No crime can be committed unless there is a victim, (Corpus Delecti). The only people who should ever be in prison are those who injure another being, human or not. If you abuse life, you should be punished. You should not be incarcerated or have your property seized for "Code Violations" or "Traffic Infractions", etc.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Debra Bryant on
-
I second the well said!
-
-
They surely do not teach this information in the Schools any more!
-
-
You said it bub. Problem is the jackass bar association and their supposed judicial officials have been getting rich of the common man and women for code violations for a long time now.
We need to find a way to hit em in their wallets for it, and we need enforcement when these foreign agents violate their oaths. If they fail to pay the bonds, it's insurance fraud plain and simple.
-
-
It is easy to establish that the gov on all levels is claiming that everyone is a citizen of the United States / fed gov via the 14th amendment.
Why is this important to understand? All the codes and even commercial laws apply even to the private actions of such people - where, constitutionally, they do not to people that are only citizens of a state.
To the point:
The power of the gov over citizens of the United States is defined in Art 4,3,2. Why do I say this? Because it also defines the limits of the gov's powers over such people.
In Art 4,3,2, the framers expressed a right to challenge any law, ordinance or rule as being unconstitutional and unenforceable because it is merely oppressive and cannot truly be proven to be 'needful'.
There is a right not to be subjected to laws and rules that the gov cannot prove are 'needful'. Therefore, anyone deemed to be a fed citizens has the 'right' to challenge the imposer of the rule or law to prove it is 'needful' and not merely oppressive.
Since this right is not listed in the bill of rights, it has remained ignored, yet it clearly exists.
The original reason for this being placed in the fed constitution was to protect conquered people no longer in rebellion against oppressive laws and rules, but since 14th subjects are under the Art 4 powers of the fed gov, this right against needless oppression applies to them also.
Now that you know about this 'constitutional right', tell others and start making use of it.
-
-
Common Law gave us the Grand Jury, Habeas Corpus, Right to a jury trial, a right for the jury to be our peers, to not be twiceput in jeopardy, right to represent ourself or an attorney-whichever you prefer, even if you cannot afford one, right not to incriminate oneself,, to be brought before the magistrate promptly, to be innocent before proven guilty, no ex post fact laws, no bill of attainders, right to make a phone call while incarcerated, Miranda rights, and everything that is common sense, within reason.
Case law is common law. Like this:
1829 US Supreme Court case Lansing v. Smith [5]:
“People of a state are entitled to all rights which formerly belong to the King, by his prerogative.”
Period. that is a ruling of fact by a judge, its settled.
1794 US Supreme Court case Glass v. Sloop Betsey [4]:
“… Our government is founded upon compact. Sovereignty was, and is, in the people”
Spooner v. McConnell, 22 F 939 @ 943 [3]:
“The sovereignty of a state does not reside in the persons who fill the different departments of its government, but in the People, from whom the government emanated; and they may change it at their discretion. Sovereignty, then in this country, abides with the constituency, and not with the agent; and this remark is true, both in reference to the federal and state government.”
US Supreme Court in 4 Wheat 402 [6]:
“The United States, as a whole, emanates from the people… The people, in their capacity as sovereigns, made and adopted the Constitution…”
“… The governments are but trustees acting under derived authority and have no power to delegate what is not delegated to them. But the people, as the original fountain might take away what they have delegated and intrust to whom they please. …The sovereignty in every state resides in the people of the state and they may alter and change their form of government at their own pleasure.”
US Supreme Court in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 US 356, page 370 [8]:
“There is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government of the United States …. In this country sovereignty resides in the people, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it: All else is withheld.”
US Supreme Court in Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe 442 US 653, 667 (1... [10]:
“In common usage, the term ‘person’ does not include the sovereign, and statutes employing the word are ordinarily construed to exclude it.”
US Supreme Court in U.S. v. Cooper, 312 US 600,604, 61 SCt 742 (1941) [11]:
In the 1935 Supreme Court case of Perry v. US (294 US 330) the Supreme Court [15] found that “In United States, sovereignty resides in people… the Congress cannot invoke the sovereign power of the People to override their will as thus declared.”
Yick Wo is a powerful anti-discrimination case. You might get the impression that the legislature can write perfectly legal laws, yet the laws cannot be enforced contrary to the intent of the people. It’s as if servants do not make rules for their masters. It’s as if the Citizens who created government were their masters. It’s as if civil servants were to obey the higher authority. You are the higher authority. Imagine that! Isn’t it a shame that your government was surrendered to those who are a terror to good works? Isn’t it a shame that you enlisted to obey them? Traditionally and logically, the Grand Jury has the power to nullify an unconstitutional law. If everyone knew their civic duty and the real laws, that sat on a grand jury...no one would get convicted of unconstitutional or unlawful codes and statutes which are only prima facia evidence of the real law. The real law is in the Statutes at large.
In California, a unknown Code that is your best frind when brought before the court is: CA Penal Code:
Section 689.
No person can be convicted of a public offense unless by verdict of a jury, accepted and recorded by the court, by a finding of the court in a case where a jury has been waived, or by a plea of guilty.
-
-
Our gov was not created by God but men. The framers decided who was sovereign and over whom. Under the common law, people are [ suppose to be ] sovereign over gov't. This 'was' the law of the whites in the states. As per the constitution, although ignored by the gov, it still is. The constitutions have not been changed.
The 14th created a citizenship in the 'United States' / fed gov. Over all things in which the fed gov has jurisdiction [ the power to make and impose its general laws ] the gov is sovereign and the people are mere subjects with few rights.
Sadly, today, even those few rights are being ignored. Welcome to communism. An example is when you are caught carrying money and the gov takes it without due process. It is not illegal to carry cash and the police never charge you with any crime involving carrying it - but they still take it. Even having money in a bank is no longer safe. If you have a business where you take in lots of small amounts of cash, the IRS claims the right to simply take it because it has become against gov policy to do business with cash.
Only in a communist country can this take place.
-
-
Bill..
Yes that is correct.
-
-
That is true Keith, our criminal justice system is the criminal Just Us system where by they do what ever the hell they want
-
-
I agree Doc but, what do you plan or suggest to do about it? Here's a little help in coming up with an answer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULu5M9D2I-Y&feature=youtu.be
Here is the whole shebang which may be the answer of what we can do on a collective basis throughout this nation. You on board? ;-) www.hudok.info
-
-
There is a new group formed to bring all liberty and freedom minded groups together under one umbrella to bring as many together as possible to fight this corruption county by county.
We are working on it at this time 24/7 along with all CSPOA and militias of the several states that wish to participate, along with all these other groups. There are thousands of Liberty and Patriot Groups throughout the United States with membership and audiences from the low thousands to a few having over 3 million followers.
Americans Standing united, is the new group of Americans working to bring us all together for the mutual benefit of us all. We want our country and Freedom back.
One group in one county, or even one state cannot do it. If they could, it would have been done already.
-
-
Obviously you do not. The money we are supported with is put into the trust which is what I believe you are referring to. This is to protect those that gave and those that labor, so that it is truly transparent regarding our motives and finances for any that cares to inquire.
I respect your decision.
-
-
fairy knows everything, even told me herself
© 2025 Created by Keith Broaders.
Powered by
