If the Titles of Nobility Amendment had been lawfully ratified as some people claim, would we the people be better off?
The purpose of the amendment was to prevent the rise of an aristocracy in the United States. The founders did not want a privileged class to be able infiltrate our government. They wanted every white man to be equal under the law.
They did not want government officials to be able to receive gifts or emoluments in exchange for political favors. Today foreign nations and Wall Street corporations contribute tens of millions of dollars to candidates running for office. Who with these politicians represent after they are elected?
Financial institutions that donate money to help get their puppets elected are doing so in order to get special benefits and privileges.
The Title of Nobility Clause is a provision in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution,[1][2] that not only forbids the United States from granting titles of nobility, but restricts members of the government from receiving gifts from foreign states without the consent of the United States Congress. This clause is also sometimes called the "federal" Nobility Clause,[3] because a similar clause in Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 bars the states (rather than the federal government) from granting titles of nobility. The Title of Nobility Clause is also one of the clauses that is sometimes called the "Emolument Clause".[4]
There were 17 states when the proposed 13th Amendment was presented to the states. In order to be properly ratified 13 states would need to vote for ratification. It seems reasonable that if 87 out of the 90 members of the House of Representatives voted in favor of the proposed amendment, it would follow that getting the approval of 13 states be likely.
The only states that had a right to vote on ratification were the 13 states that existed in 1810. The amendment is still pending and if Virginia officially voted today the Amendment would be lawfully ratified.
The originally proposed second amendment failed to be ratified in 1791 and 101 years later the same amendment was repackaged as the 27th Amendment thus making it necessary to obtain the approval of three-fourths of the 50 states.
The only thing preventing the implementation of this amendment is the BAR Association attorneys who have a vested interest in perpetuating the fraud.
The fact that the original 13th amendment is not being enforced benefits the few at the expense of the many.
Do the BAR Association attorneys have rights, privileges and immunities that are not granted to others? Do the same criminals who write our laws, interpret our laws and prosecute the offenders all belong to the same fraternity known as the BAR Association?
Tags:
Does Article 1 predate the original 13 th Amendment ?
So lawyers are illegal?
And hitlery has lost her citizenship status? along with her daughter?
What am I missing?
Anyone working for the government who accepts a gift in exchange for a political favor has committed a crime. This provision in the Constitution was written to prevent corruption in government. The lawyers write the laws, interpret the laws and enforce the laws. Is it any wonder why the crooked lawyer, greedy bankers and corrupt politicians have turned the American Dream into an American Nightmare.
© 2025 Created by Keith Broaders.
Powered by