BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:NingEventWidget-v1
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Pacific/Midway
X-LIC-LOCATION:Pacific/Midway
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-1100
TZOFFSETTO:-1100
TZNAME:SST
DTSTART:19700101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:6585610:Event:299858
DTSTAMP:20260405T155658Z
SUMMARY:Reclaiming the Republic
DESCRIPTION:The real purpose of the 17th Amendment was not to give a l
 arger and more responsive voice to the people, but to consolidate powe
 r in the Congress of the United States, instead. The hidden agenda was
  revealed when they allegedly got the states to give up their represen
 tation in the senate by claiming the 17th Amendment had passed; a comp
 letely false declaration by then Secretary of State, William Jennings
  Bryan, May 31st, 1913.\r\nIn 1913 the proposed amendment was presente
 d to the states for ratification; 36 of the 48 states quickly voted fo
 r ratification while 12 states did not.  Five more states eventually 
 gave their consent to the ratification of the proposed amendment.\r\n\
 r\nLouisiana — June 11, 1914\r\nAlabama — April 11, 2002[37]\r\n
 Delaware — July 1, 2010[38] (After rejecting the amendment on Marc
 h 18, 1913)\r\nMaryland — April 1, 2012[39][40][41]\r\nRhode Island
  – June 20, 2014   \r\n\r\nIn Article V, The Constitution clearly
  mandates that; \r\nFlorida, Georgia, Mississippi, Kentucky, South Ca
 rolina and Virginia took no action and Utah flatly rejected the amendm
 ent. Delaware initially vote against ratifcation, but changed their vo
 te to the affirmative in 2010. There are currently 42 states that have
  voluntarily given up their suffrage in the senate.\r\nIf seven of the
  states that have ratified the amendment were to change their vote on 
 the ratification, the number of states voting in the affirmtive would 
 be 35 and the amendment would fall one vote short of the 36 states req
 uired for ratification.\r\nWhen Delaware changed their vote in 2010, i
 t was established that states which have ratified the amendment have t
 he right to withdraw their consent to the passage of the 17th amendmen
 t.\r\nThis precedent would allow any of the states which voted in favo
 r of the amendment to withdraw their consent. If seven states did so i
 t would reduce the number of states to have ratified the amendment to 
 35, which is one vote short of the three fourths required for ratifica
 tion.\r\nArticlt, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senat
 e\".\n\nFor more information visit https://constitutionalstudies.ning.
 com/events/eeclaiming-the-republic
DTSTART;TZID=Pacific/Midway:20180911T150000
DTEND;TZID=Pacific/Midway:20180911T160000
CATEGORIES:radop, show
LOCATION:On Your Telephone or Home Computer
WEBSITE:http://redstatetalkradio.com
URL:http://redstatetalkradio.com
CONTACT:Phone: 215-867-8255
ORGANIZER:G R Mobley
ATTACH;FMTTYPE="image/jpeg":http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/
 file/get/2058201674?profile=original
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;RSVP=TRUE;CN="Keith Br
 oaders":https://constitutionalstudies.ning.com/profile/1zhl2tkjuuefc
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR