Quotes From The Founding Fathers

[Keith Broaders]

“It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.”
Benjamin Franklin
"Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God".
Benjamin Franklin

Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety". Benjamin Franklin

    

"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he  must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear".Thomas Jefferson

If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization,
it expects what never was and never will be.
Thomas Jefferson

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up
homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered."
Thomas Jefferson

 

 

"Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil;
in its worst state, an intolerable one".
Thomas Paine 

Among the natural rights of the colonists are these: First a right to life, secondly to liberty, and thirdly to property; together with the right to defend them
in the best manner they can.
Samuel Adams 

 

Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force.
Like fire, it is a  dangerous servant and a fearful master.  
George  Washington

There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest
political evil under our Constitution.
John Adams

In  Republics, the great danger is, that the majority
may not sufficiently respect  the rights of the minority.
James Madison 

Dear Friends,

I know that I recent post that questioned the Constitution was very offensive to some of the website members, but I make no apologies. I am a seeker of the truth and I believe that it is my responsibility to question authority in order to uncover the truth. Many of the things that we have been taught in government schools are simply not true. We have been lied to by our government time and time again. Is it wrong to question the motives of our founding fathers or should we blindly obey and honor these without taking the time to study the facts. I believe that it is my responsibility to provide your with the facts so that you can draw your own conclusion. Don't accept anything that have written, study the issues. For those believe in the power of prayer, I would ask you to call upon your God to provide you with the answers you seek. I believe that is it not wrong to question authority, I believe that it is our duty. If we blindly believe what our government tells us, we are more easily enslaved.

Keith Broaders

“But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it.  In either case it is unfit to exist.”
Lysander Spooner

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government".
"Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil;
in its worst state, an intolerable one.
Thomas Paine

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are  free".
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

"Power tends to corrupt and absolutely power corrupts absolutely
John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton

[Osceola Renegade]

BAR - British Admiralty Registery - Keep track of those that want to be of the fold and bump them up as they learn the tools of their trait.  (P.S. A lawyer replaced the mercenaries of the 12th Century because too many people got killed - for 8 or so centuries they have advanced their skills through controlled lying.

Now they have advanced their skills to become the KINGS of the World through deceipt - except, their chains are pulled by the really rich old bastards of the World who want it all.
 
Kevin Montgomery Smith said:

Practicing law isn't a crime,and neither is right of association-so,the BAR unionizes under a different guise...how do we prevent snakes from slithering into public office?And who determines the difference between employment and involuntary servitude?Slippery slope.

[Mark Dabney]

I have heard different permutations British Admiralty Registry

                                                              Aristocracy Regency

                                                              Attorney

                                                              A - whatever else....

What they all have in common is BRITISH - from the Hebrew "Covenant Man"

How much credibility does this have?  Some have almost admitted to it - others have acted evasively -

Fundamentally we have a system so ensnared in LEGALISM that Right and Wrong has no traction

[Osceola Renegade]

Mark;

The BAR is not a permutation.  It is in reality our current day BAR.

The Leader of the BAR is the JUDGE ships and all lawyers bow to the Judge.

If a lawyer challenges openly a Judge, they are sanctioned by the BAR to get in line or out.

That is why there is no such thing as a legal trial any more.  Your Defence Lawyer is out to satisfy his dime with the Judge - not your case.

Check out the history of BAR.

[Mark Dabney]

What I MEANT was that what ever B. A. R. stands for is open for debate - I have heard different permutations - it is clear they have gone out of their way to obscure the issue - and not without cause

[Bill May]

In response to:  "Practicing law isn't a crime"  There is old case history that arose in constitutional courts that affirm this statement.

The constitutionally defined, and thereby created, state courts were closed in the 1950's and legislative branch created 'statutory courts' silently replaced them thanks to what appears to be a communist controlled Bar ASSoc.

What is important about this is that when a legislative body and not the state constitution creates a court, they also get to create the rules the private admin court will follow. In this case, they have all determined that only members of the Bar can be a fact finder [ judge ] or a prosecutor and only such members can work in such courts representing US / 14th subjects.

To go further, to close all the constitutional courts, the gov has to pretend that only 14th subjects are left and that no state-only citizens now exist.

The courts have held that 14th subjects have almost no rights, including the right to own anything except a conservator ship interest in property or even the right to work without gov permission. Thus, without the SCt stating otherwise, we must assume that means that the gov gets to determine what professions people engage in - as with electricians and plumbing.

This concept is of particular importance to those in power [ assumed to be communists taking over a free country ] because they do not dare have people engaged in the paid practice of law that they cannot totally dominate.

[Osceola Renegade]

Thank you bill may.

That lends itself to the notion that Without Prejudice, UCC 1-308 reserves the rights these bastards are trying to strip you of and have not quite gotten it right yet.

That puts them in the only court of meaning and that is Contractual and Civil.

Unless there is a injured party, and a law that has been breached, there is no such thing as a criminal charge.  Try telling that to STUPID CHIPS and Starsky and Hutch cops.

This could be interesting if it goes a little further with different opinions.

Thanks again Bill May

[Bill May]

In response to:  "That lends itself to the notion that Without Prejudice, UCC 1-308 reserves the rights these bastards are trying to strip you of..."

You are making the assumption that 14th citizenship carries with it a long list of constitutionally secured rights.  All case history is to the contrary. The courts have stated that the 14th does not even incorporate the  bill of rights. That while some of the rights are the same or similar, most of the rights enumerated in the bill of rights are not considered incorporated into the 14th or its due process clause - such as a trial by jury for example with the common law right of jury nullification.

Another issue is the UCC itself. If you look into the UCC, it is mere contract law codified and provides an alternative to tradition for the rules of contracts. Thus 1-308 would refer to a right rights and duties of performance in regard to a contractual agreement.

Rights secured by a constitution, according to the SCt, do not need such a caviet, but instead, the relevant constitution, such as for a state for its citizens, imposes the duty upon the state and its officials to refrain from trespassing upon a right of an individual to do an act or to refrain from doing an act.